AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57191 vs 55409
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3715
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3357
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3715
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3357
- Around 26% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5888 vs 4670
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 22 Nov 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57191 vs 55409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5888 vs 4670 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1265 MHz
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10144 vs 8669
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 753 vs 492
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 11117
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 11117
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1265 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10144 vs 8669 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 753 vs 492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 vs 11117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 vs 11117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8669 | 10144 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 492 | 753 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57191 | 55409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5888 | 4670 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1940.024 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.167 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 102.69 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU116 |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 22 Nov 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 210 | 269 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 138.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 6600 million |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |