AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 493 vs 365
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57141 vs 53714
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3718
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3358
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3718
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3358
- Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5982 vs 4927
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 23 April 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 vs 365 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57141 vs 53714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5982 vs 4927 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 1265 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 11117
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 11117
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz vs 1265 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8652 vs 8609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 vs 11117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 vs 11117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8609 | 8652 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 | 365 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57141 | 53714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 12301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 12301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5982 | 4927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU116 |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 23 April 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 210 | 334 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1335 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 128.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 6600 million |
Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |