AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • 8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
  • Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 493 vs 365
  • Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57141 vs 53714
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3718
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3358
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3718
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3358
  • Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5982 vs 4927
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 Jan 2020 vs 23 April 2019
Texture fill rate 182.2 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s
Pipelines 2304 vs 1536
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 493 vs 365
Geekbench - OpenCL 57141 vs 53714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8904 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7694 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8904 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7694 vs 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5982 vs 4927

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

  • Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 1265 MHz
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 11117
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 11117
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1335 MHz vs 1265 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8652 vs 8609
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12301 vs 11117
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12301 vs 11117

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
8609
8652
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
493
365
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
57141
53714
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11117
12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8904
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7694
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11117
12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8904
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7694
3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
5982
4927
Name AMD Radeon RX 5600M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark 8609 8652
PassMark - G2D Mark 493 365
Geekbench - OpenCL 57141 53714
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11117 12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8904 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7694 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11117 12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8904 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7694 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5982 4927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 195.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1919.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 14.6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.964
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 492.867

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5600M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture RDNA Turing
Code name Navi 10 TU116
Launch date 7 Jan 2020 23 April 2019
Place in performance rating 210 334
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1265 MHz 1335 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Pipelines 2304 1536
Texture fill rate 182.2 GTexel/s 128.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 60 Watt
Transistor count 10300 million 6600 million
Core clock speed 1140 MHz
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 128.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.202 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.101 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate 64.08 GPixel/s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 12.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4 6.4
OpenCL 1.2
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 288.0 GB/s 288.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 192 bit 192 bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6