AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1265 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 1659.4x more texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1344
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8652 vs 5427
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11117 vs 8276
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3627
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3354
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11117 vs 8276
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3627
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3354
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 25 August 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1344 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8652 vs 5427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 vs 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 vs 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 694 vs 492
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 694 vs 492 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8652 | 5427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 492 | 694 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57142 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5902 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Kepler |
Code name | Navi 10 | GK104 |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 25 August 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 210 | 307 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 980 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 3,540 million |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |