AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon RX 5600M

NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1265 MHz vs 1114 MHz
851.8x more texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 81% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 6612 MHz
Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57142 vs 37354
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3714
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3356
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3714
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3356

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 Jan 2020 vs 21 March 2015
Boost clock speed	1265 MHz vs 1114 MHz
Texture fill rate	182.2 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 6612 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	57142 vs 37354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8904 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7694 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8904 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7694 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11792 vs 8652
Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 737 vs 492
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13738 vs 11117
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13738 vs 11117

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	3072 vs 2304
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	11792 vs 8652
PassMark - G2D Mark	737 vs 492
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13738 vs 11117
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13738 vs 11117

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

8652

11792

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

492

737

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

57142

37354

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11117

13738

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8904

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7694

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11117

13738

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8904

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7694

3356

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5600M	NVIDIA Quadro M6000
PassMark - G3D Mark	8652	11792
PassMark - G2D Mark	492	737
Geekbench - OpenCL	57142	37354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11117	13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8904	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7694	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11117	13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8904	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7694	3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		207.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2593.621
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		12.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		145.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		768.171

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5600M	NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Navi 10	GM200
Launch date	7 Jan 2020	21 March 2015
Place in performance rating	210	243
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$4,199.99
Price now		$2,825
Value for money (0-100)		4.69
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1265 MHz	1114 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2304	3072
Texture fill rate	182.2 GTexel/s	213.9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	10300 million	8,000 million
Core clock speed		988 MHz
Floating-point performance		6,844 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	317.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5