AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
  • Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1265 MHz vs 1215 MHz
  • Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 175.0 GTexel/s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8609 vs 8366
  • Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 493 vs 343
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11117 vs 10140
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3706
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3351
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11117 vs 10140
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3706
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3351
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 Jan 2020 vs 27 May 2019
Boost clock speed 1265 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Texture fill rate 182.2 GTexel/s vs 175.0 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8609 vs 8366
PassMark - G2D Mark 493 vs 343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11117 vs 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8904 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7694 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11117 vs 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8904 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7694 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 57141
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 68305 vs 57141

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
8609
8366
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
493
343
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
57141
68305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11117
10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8904
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7694
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11117
10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8904
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7694
3351
Name AMD Radeon RX 5600M NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark 8609 8366
PassMark - G2D Mark 493 343
Geekbench - OpenCL 57141 68305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11117 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8904 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7694 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11117 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8904 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7694 3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 220.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2046.214
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 645.647

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5600M NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture RDNA Turing
Code name Navi 10 TU106
Launch date 7 Jan 2020 27 May 2019
Place in performance rating 210 325
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1265 MHz 1215 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Pipelines 2304 2304
Texture fill rate 182.2 GTexel/s 175.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 60 Watt
Transistor count 10300 million 10800 million
Core clock speed 600 MHz
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 175.0 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 11.20 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.599 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate 77.76 GPixel/s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12 12.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4 6.4
OpenCL 1.2
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 288.0 GB/s 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 192 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6