AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
- 3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8652 vs 6601
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 492 vs 421
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57142 vs 32981
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11117 vs 9009
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3718
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3359
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11117 vs 9009
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3718
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 27 May 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8652 vs 6601 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 492 vs 421 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57142 vs 32981 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 vs 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 vs 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1265 MHz
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1265 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8652 | 6601 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 492 | 421 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57142 | 32981 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5902 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU117 |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 210 | 391 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 69.84 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 4700 million |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 128 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |