AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 926-1168 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1206-1244 MHz vs 902 MHz
- 735.5x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 vs 543
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36141 vs 22920
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 vs 67.178
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 vs 7.435
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 vs 355.166
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz vs 902 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 vs 543 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36141 vs 22920 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 vs 67.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 vs 7.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 vs 355.166 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- Around 41% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 2048
- 1018.8x better floating-point performance: 5,196 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8059 vs 6967
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1816.61 vs 1083.926
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.889 vs 79.029
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 9172
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3624
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 9172
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3624
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 5,196 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8059 vs 6967 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1816.61 vs 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.889 vs 79.029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12657 vs 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12657 vs 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 8059 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 543 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36141 | 22920 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 67.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 1816.61 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 7.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 88.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 355.166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3864 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GK110B |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 23 July 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $5,265 |
Place in performance rating | 396 | 362 |
Price now | $149.99 | $833.98 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | 11.34 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz | 902 MHz |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz | 797 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 5,196 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2880 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 216.5 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |