AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16693 vs 12960
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 929 vs 746
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 77084 vs 64683
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 vs 174.714
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 vs 3924.968
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.769 vs 17.305
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 175.219
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 vs 1226.861
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14699 vs 13848
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3369 vs 3336
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14699 vs 13848
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3369 vs 3336
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 10 July 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16693 vs 12960 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 929 vs 746 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77084 vs 64683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 vs 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 vs 3924.968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 vs 17.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 vs 1226.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 vs 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 vs 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 304.8 GT/s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s vs 304.8 GT/s |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16693 | 12960 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 929 | 746 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77084 | 64683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 3924.968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 17.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1226.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9492 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 10 July 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $400 | $1,599 |
Place in performance rating | 148 | 197 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 304.8 GT/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.3 B | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |