AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 91% higher boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16693 vs 8137
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 929 vs 745
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 77084 vs 53806
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 vs 141.474
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 vs 3621.344
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.769 vs 13.132
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 112.973
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 vs 799.933
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14699 vs 10141
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14699 vs 10141
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 26 April 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16693 vs 8137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 929 vs 745 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77084 vs 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 vs 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 vs 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 vs 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 vs 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 7.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 304.8 GT/s
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3369
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3369
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 304.8 GT/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 3369 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16693 | 8137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 929 | 745 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77084 | 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 38251 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9492 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Capsaicin |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 26 April 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $400 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | 148 | 190 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Design | reference | |
Price now | $849 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | 128 |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 304.8 GT/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.3 B | 8,900 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Eyefinity | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 3x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 277 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |