AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16693 vs 12354
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 929 vs 601
- Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9492 vs 7476
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16693 vs 12354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 929 vs 601 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9492 vs 7476 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18604 vs 14699
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3720
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3369
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18604 vs 14699
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3720
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3369
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 vs 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 vs 3369 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16693 | 12354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 929 | 601 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77084 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 8029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 8029 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9492 | 7476 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU106 |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $400 | |
Place in performance rating | 148 | 129 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Price now | $489.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.3 B | 10,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |