AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1215 MHz
  • Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 1440 MHz
  • Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16693 vs 12354
  • Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 929 vs 601
  • Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9492 vs 7476
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 July 2019 vs 29 January 2019
Core clock speed 1605 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Boost clock speed 1905 MHz vs 1440 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 16693 vs 12354
PassMark - G2D Mark 929 vs 601
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 9492 vs 7476

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

  • Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18604 vs 14699
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3720
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3369
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18604 vs 14699
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3720
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3369
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 18604 vs 14699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8898 vs 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8029 vs 3369
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 18604 vs 14699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8898 vs 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8029 vs 3369

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
16693
12354
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
929
601
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14699
18604
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3720
8898
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3369
8029
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14699
18604
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3720
8898
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3369
8029
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
9492
7476
Name AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark 16693 12354
PassMark - G2D Mark 929 601
Geekbench - OpenCL 77084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 252.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3949.565
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 24.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 254.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1322.129
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14699 18604
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3720 8898
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3369 8029
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14699 18604
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3720 8898
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3369 8029
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 9492 7476

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

Essentials

Architecture RDNA Turing
Code name Navi 10 TU106
Launch date 7 July 2019 29 January 2019
Launch price (MSRP) $400
Place in performance rating 148 129
Type Desktop Laptop
Price now $489.99
Value for money (0-100) 49.06

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1905 MHz 1440 MHz
Compute units 40
Core clock speed 1605 MHz 1215 MHz
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 19.51 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 9.75 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate 121.9 GP/s
Render output units 64
Stream Processors 2560
Texture fill rate 304.8 GT/s
Texture Units 160
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 115 Watt
Transistor count 10.3 B 10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm
Pipelines 2304

Video outputs and ports

DisplayPort support
HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12 12.0
Vulkan
OpenGL 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 Bit
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
TrueAudio
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready