AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
  • Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1440 MHz
  • Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 1770 MHz
  • Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 3678
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 3678
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 July 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Core clock speed 1605 MHz vs 1440 MHz
Boost clock speed 1905 MHz vs 1770 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3723 vs 3678
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3723 vs 3678

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14996 vs 13746
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 vs 749
  • 4.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 342789 vs 70842
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19516 vs 13463
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 3297
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19516 vs 13463
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 3297
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 14996 vs 13746
PassMark - G2D Mark 813 vs 749
Geekbench - OpenCL 342789 vs 70842
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19516 vs 13463
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3324 vs 3297
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19516 vs 13463
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3324 vs 3297

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
13746
14996
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
749
813
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
70842
342789
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13463
19516
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3723
3678
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3297
3324
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13463
19516
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3723
3678
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3297
3324
Name AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark 13746 14996
PassMark - G2D Mark 749 813
Geekbench - OpenCL 70842 342789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 246.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3586.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 24.663
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 189.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1272.801
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13463 19516
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3723 3678
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3297 3324
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13463 19516
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3723 3678
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3297 3324
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 8

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Essentials

Architecture RDNA Turing
Code name Navi 10 TU102
Launch date 7 July 2019 13 August 2018
Launch price (MSRP) $400 $6,299
Place in performance rating 39 18
Type Desktop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1905 MHz 1770 MHz
Compute units 40
Core clock speed 1605 MHz 1440 MHz
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 19.51 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 9.75 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate 121.9 GP/s
Render output units 64
Stream Processors 2560
Texture fill rate 304.8 GT/s
Texture Units 160
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 10.3 B 18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm

Video outputs and ports

DisplayPort support
HDMI
Display Connectors 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin 2x 8-pin
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (12_1)
Vulkan
OpenGL 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit
Memory type GDDR6
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
TrueAudio
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready