AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1440 MHz
• Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 1770 MHz
• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 791
• Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 77150 vs 74179
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 153.677

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 16670
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 252.601
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 3949.565
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 24.769
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1322.129
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 14699
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 14699
• Around 47% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 9488

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	16670 18872
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	927 791
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	77150 74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	252.601 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3949.565 5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.769 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	254.777 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1322.129 1534.582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14699 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3720 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3369 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14699 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3720 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3369 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	9488 13943

Compare specifications (specs)