AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA Tesla M6 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 304.8 GT/s vs 113.3 GTexel / s
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16668 vs 6284
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 371
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14699 vs 9390
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3683
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3369 vs 3260
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14699 vs 9390
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3683
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3369 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 30 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 304.8 GT/s vs 113.3 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16668 vs 6284 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 vs 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 vs 3260 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 225 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M6
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16668 | 6284 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 371 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77152 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 3260 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9486 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $400 | |
| Place in performance rating | 148 | 356 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Texture fill rate | 304.8 GT/s | 113.3 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 160 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10.3 B | 5,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | None |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 160.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIATITAN V
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
