AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14498 vs 8137
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 889 vs 745
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66229 vs 53806
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 vs 141.474
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 vs 3621.344
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 vs 13.132
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 112.973
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1036.448 vs 799.933
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11536 vs 10141
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11536 vs 10141
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 26 April 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14498 vs 8137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 vs 745 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66229 vs 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 vs 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 vs 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 vs 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 vs 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 9.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 248.4 GT/s
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3366
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3366
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 248.4 GT/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 3366 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14498 | 8137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 | 745 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66229 | 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 38251 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8500 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Capsaicin |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 26 April 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | 177 | 188 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Design | reference | |
Price now | $849 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | 128 |
Core clock speed | 1465 MHz | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 248.4 GT/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.3 B | 8,900 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Eyefinity | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 3x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 277 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |