AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1683 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 889 vs 876
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66232 vs 51434
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 vs 182.11
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 vs 1797.792
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 vs 14.071
- 9.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 26.444
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 3638
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 vs 3344
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 3638
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 vs 3344
- Around 25% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8501 vs 6809
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 2 November 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1683 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 vs 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66232 vs 51434 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 vs 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 vs 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 vs 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 vs 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8501 vs 6809 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1465 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 255.8 GTexel / s vs 248.4 GT/s
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14685 vs 14501
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 11536
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 11536
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1465 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 255.8 GTexel / s vs 248.4 GT/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14685 vs 14501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 vs 11536 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14501 | 14685 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 | 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66232 | 51434 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8501 | 6809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 10 | GP104 |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 2 November 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 177 | 237 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1465 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 248.4 GT/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.3 B | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | |
Pipelines | 2432 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |