AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 and NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 5700

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1465 MHz vs 861 MHz
Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1038 MHz
Around 87% higher texture fill rate: 248.4 GT/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14501 vs 7915
Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 889 vs 698
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 3684
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 3684

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 July 2019 vs 8 April 2016
Core clock speed	1465 MHz vs 861 MHz
Boost clock speed	1725 MHz vs 1038 MHz
Texture fill rate	248.4 GT/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	14501 vs 7915
PassMark - G2D Mark	889 vs 698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3723 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3723 vs 3684

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 180 Watt
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11804 vs 11536
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3366
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11804 vs 11536
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3366

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt vs 180 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11804 vs 11536
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4193 vs 3366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11804 vs 11536
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4193 vs 3366

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

14501

7915

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

889

698

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11536

11804

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3723

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3366

4193

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11536

11804

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3723

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3366

4193

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5700	NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark	14501	7915
PassMark - G2D Mark	889	698
Geekbench - OpenCL	66232
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	209.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3686.851
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	21.941
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	250
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1036.448
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11536	11804
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3723	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3366	4193
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11536	11804
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3723	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3366	4193
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	8501

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5700	NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Navi 10	GM204
Launch date	7 July 2019	8 April 2016
Launch price (MSRP)	$350
Place in performance rating	177	242
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1725 MHz	1038 MHz
Compute units	36
Core clock speed	1465 MHz	861 MHz
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	15.9 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7.95 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate	110.4 GP/s
Render output units	64
Stream Processors	2304
Texture fill rate	248.4 GT/s	132.9 GTexel / s
Texture Units	144
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	180 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	10.3 B	5,200 million
Floating-point performance		4,252 gflops
Manufacturing process technology		28 nm
Pipelines		2048
Video outputs and ports
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Display Connectors		No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_1)
Vulkan
OpenGL		4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	224.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	256 Bit
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory clock speed		7012 MHz
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
TrueAudio
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready