AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1465 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 889 vs 869
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 215.219
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 vs 3290
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 vs 3290
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1465 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 vs 869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 215.219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3290 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 14498
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 136722 vs 66229
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 209.509
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 3686.851
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 21.941
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1036.448
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 11536
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 11536
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 vs 14498 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 136722 vs 66229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 vs 209.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 vs 3686.851 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 vs 21.941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 vs 1036.448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 11536 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14498 | 19370 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 | 869 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66229 | 136722 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 401.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 6432.348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 43.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 215.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 2101.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3290 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8500 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU102 |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | $9,999 |
Place in performance rating | 177 | 103 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1465 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 248.4 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.3 B | 18,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 2x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |