AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1465 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 280 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 889 vs 827
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 18 December 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1465 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 280 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 vs 827 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 14500
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 66222
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 11536
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 11536
- Around 78% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 15164 vs 8501
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19986 vs 14500 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 66222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 11536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 11536 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 vs 8501 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14500 | 19986 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 | 827 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66222 | 138072 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8501 | 15164 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 18 December 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | $2,499 |
| Place in performance rating | 177 | 90 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1465 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture fill rate | 248.4 GT/s | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 280 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10.3 B | 18,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
| Pipelines | 4608 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5700 with others
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
IntelArc A730M
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
