AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1168 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1284 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 46% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9258 vs 6316
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9258 vs 6316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 October 2018 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1168 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1284 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 vs 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70535 vs 34844
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3709
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3351
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3709
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3351
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 vs 34844 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7711 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34844 | 70535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 27566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 27566 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3788 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 15 October 2018 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 335 | 165 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1284 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1168 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 2,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |