AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1168 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1284 MHz vs 925 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 46% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
  • Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9258 vs 6316
  • Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9258 vs 6316
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 October 2018 vs 13 March 2015
Core clock speed 1168 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed 1284 MHz vs 925 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9258 vs 6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9258 vs 6316

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

  • 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70535 vs 34844
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3709
  • 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3351
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3709
  • 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3351
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 70535 vs 34844
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8390 vs 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 27566 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8390 vs 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 27566 vs 3351

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
34844
70535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9258
6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3709
8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
27566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9258
6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3709
8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
27566
Name AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
PassMark - G3D Mark 7711
PassMark - G2D Mark 661
Geekbench - OpenCL 34844 70535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 115.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1890.261
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 149.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 614.542
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9258 6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3709 8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 27566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9258 6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3709 8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 27566
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3788

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Polaris 20 Pitcairn
Launch date 15 October 2018 13 March 2015
Place in performance rating 335 165
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1284 MHz 925 MHz
Core clock speed 1168 MHz 900 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 5,700 million 2,800 million
Floating-point performance 1,894 gflops
Pipelines 1024
Texture fill rate 59.2 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 241 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Memory clock speed 7000 MHz 4800 MHz
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 153.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory type GDDR5