AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1168 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1284 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7711 vs 6559
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34844 vs 27108
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9258 vs 8931
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9258 vs 8931
- Around 30% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3788 vs 2911
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 October 2018 vs 1 February 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1168 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1284 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7711 vs 6559 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34844 vs 27108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 vs 8931 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 vs 8931 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3788 vs 2911 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 661
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 vs 661 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3709 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7711 | 6559 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 | 784 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34844 | 27108 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 8931 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 8931 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3788 | 2911 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Polaris 22 |
Launch date | 15 October 2018 | 1 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 335 | 327 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1284 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1168 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1536 | |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB / s | |
Memory type | HBM2 | |
Shared memory | 0 |