AMD Radeon RX 580 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 1188 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- 1078x more texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 179.0 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8880 vs 7885
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42211 vs 38420
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 vs 597.677
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 vs 10320
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 3575
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 vs 10320
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 3575
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 10 November 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 1188 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s vs 179.0 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8880 vs 7885 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42211 vs 38420 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 vs 115.834 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 vs 597.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 vs 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 vs 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3347 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
- 923.9x better floating-point performance: 5,728 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 vs 771
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1987.633 vs 1022.932
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.152 vs 9.235
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 105.263 vs 84.034
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 vs 771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1987.633 vs 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.152 vs 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 105.263 vs 84.034 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 580 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8880 | 7885 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 771 | 812 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42211 | 38420 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | 115.834 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | 1987.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | 10.152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | 105.263 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 | 597.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 | 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 | 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3347 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 580 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Ellesmere |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 10 November 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $799 |
Place in performance rating | 331 | 310 |
Price now | $169.99 | $539.99 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 76.21 | 19.25 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1340 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 1188 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | 5,728 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s | 179.0 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 224.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
HDMI 2.0 |