AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6839 vs 3712
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6839 vs 3712
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 3353
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1499 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 239.8 GTexel/s vs 198.7 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 821 vs 646
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12687 vs 8558
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16433 vs 5140
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16433 vs 5140
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 9 Mar 2020 |
Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s vs 198.7 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 821 vs 646 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12687 vs 8558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 vs 5140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 vs 5140 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 646 | 821 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8558 | 12687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5140 | 16433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5140 | 16433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4433 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 59743 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Navi 10 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 | 4 Aug 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 208 | 175 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1499 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | 7.675 TFLOPS |
Pixel fill rate | 44.16 GPixel/s | 95.94 GPixel/s |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 239.8 GTexel/s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 10300 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 350 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |