AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME

  • Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 1243 MHz
  • Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6839 vs 3712
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6839 vs 3712
  • 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 3353
  • 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 3353
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1257 MHz vs 1243 MHz
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6839 vs 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6839 vs 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 20161 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 20161 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1499 MHz vs 1380 MHz
  • Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 239.8 GTexel/s vs 198.7 GTexel/s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
  • Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 175 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 821 vs 646
  • Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12687 vs 8558
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16433 vs 5140
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16433 vs 5140
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 4 Aug 2020 vs 9 Mar 2020
Boost clock speed 1499 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Texture fill rate 239.8 GTexel/s vs 198.7 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt vs 175 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 821 vs 646
PassMark - G3D Mark 12687 vs 8558
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16433 vs 5140
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16433 vs 5140

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
646
821
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
8558
12687
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5140
16433
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5140
16433
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6839
3712
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6839
3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20161
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20161
3353
Name AMD Radeon RX 590 GME AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark 646 821
PassMark - G3D Mark 8558 12687
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5140 16433
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5140 16433
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6839 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6839 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 20161 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 20161 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4433
Geekbench - OpenCL 59743

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 590 GME AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 RDNA 1.0
Code name Polaris 20 Navi 10
Design Radeon RX 500 Series
Launch date 9 Mar 2020 4 Aug 2020
Place in performance rating 208 175
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1380 MHz 1499 MHz
Compute units 36 40
Core clock speed 1257 MHz 1243 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 7 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 6.359 TFLOPS 7.675 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate 44.16 GPixel/s 95.94 GPixel/s
Render output units 32
Stream Processors 2304
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s 239.8 GTexel/s
Texture Units 144
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 175 Watt 130 Watt
Transistor count 5700 million 10300 million
Maximum GPU temperature 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pipelines 2560

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 241 mm (9.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 450 Watt 350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin None
Width Dual-slot IGP

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.1
OpenCL 2.0 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Memory bandwidth 256 GB/s 384 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support