AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 3356.4x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
| Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective)
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6316 vs 5140
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6316 vs 5140
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 6839
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 6839
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 20161
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 20161
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 175 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6316 vs 5140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6316 vs 5140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 6839 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 6839 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 20161 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 20161 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 658 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8570 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5140 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5140 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 | 27566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 | 27566 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4431 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | Pitcairn |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 206 | 165 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.16 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5700 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) | 4800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 590 GME with others
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
