AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs AMD Radeon RX Vega
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and AMD Radeon RX Vega videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 646.8x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 307.2 GTexel / s
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5140 vs 2094
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5140 vs 2094
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6839 vs 2391
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6839 vs 2391
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 8455
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 8455
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 vs 1 April 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 307.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5140 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5140 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 vs 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 vs 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 vs 8455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 vs 8455 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 658
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12297 vs 8570
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 vs 658 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12297 vs 8570 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | AMD Radeon RX Vega |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 658 | 882 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8570 | 12297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5140 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5140 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 | 8455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 | 8455 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4431 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67658 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.049 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4007.96 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.022 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.8 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1292.989 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | AMD Radeon RX Vega | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.3 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Greenland |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 | 1 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 206 | 238 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599.99 | |
Price now | $409.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 44.16 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 307.2 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | |
Floating-point performance | 9,830 gflops | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |