AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 845.9x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6839 vs 5581
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6839 vs 5581
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 3360
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 vs 27 June 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 vs 5581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 vs 5581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 vs 3360 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 5x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective)
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 731 vs 657
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11482 vs 8560
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17105 vs 5140
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17105 vs 5140
- Around 36% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6008 vs 4432
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 731 vs 657 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11482 vs 8560 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17105 vs 5140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17105 vs 5140 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6008 vs 4432 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 657 | 731 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8560 | 11482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5140 | 17105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5140 | 17105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 | 5581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 | 5581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4432 | 6008 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45938 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GP104 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 204 | 181 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 44.16 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 234.9 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 7,516 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 320.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) | 10008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |