AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon RX 590 GME

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME

2.1x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 657 vs 389
Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8560 vs 7566
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 8062
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 8062
Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4432 vs 3668

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	657 vs 389
PassMark - G3D Mark	8560 vs 7566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	20161 vs 8062
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	20161 vs 8062
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4432 vs 3668

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1257 MHz
Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1380 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
3.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 175 Watt
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 5140
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 5140
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 6839
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 6839

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1350 MHz vs 1257 MHz
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 175 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12180 vs 5140
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12180 vs 5140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926 vs 6839
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926 vs 6839

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

657

389

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

8560

7566

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5140

12180

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5140

12180

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6839

8926

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6839

8926

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20161

8062

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20161

8062

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

4432

3668

Name	AMD Radeon RX 590 GME	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark	657	389
PassMark - G3D Mark	8560	7566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5140	12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5140	12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	6839	8926
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	6839	8926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	20161	8062
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	20161	8062
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4432	3668
Geekbench - OpenCL		41946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		151.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1844.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		10.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		115.919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		644.054

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 590 GME	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Turing
Code name	Polaris 20	TU117
Design	Radeon RX 500 Series
Launch date	9 Mar 2020	2 Apr 2020
Place in performance rating	206	273
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1485 MHz
Compute units	36
Core clock speed	1257 MHz	1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	397.4 GFLOPS (1:16)	95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.359 TFLOPS (1:1)	6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.359 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate	44.16 GPixel/s	47.52 GPixel/s
Render output units	32
Stream Processors	2304
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s	95.04 GTexel/s
Texture Units	144
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	175 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	5700 million	4700 million
Pipelines		1024
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm (9.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU)	450 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Width	Dual-slot
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.1
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	256 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective)	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support