AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 657 vs 566
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6839 vs 3716
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6839 vs 3716
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 3359
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 657 vs 566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective)
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12794 vs 8560
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 5140
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 5140
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 vs 8560 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 vs 5140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 vs 5140 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 657 | 566 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8560 | 12794 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5140 | 18169 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5140 | 18169 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4432 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68858 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
Code name | Polaris 20 | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 206 | 181 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1380 - 1485 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 780 - 960 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 44.16 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 13600 million |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |