AMD Radeon RX 590 vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 993.2x more texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 224.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 57% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 16x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 vs 132.701
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13383 vs 10116
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13383 vs 10116
- Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4763 vs 4739
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 vs 10 July 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s vs 224.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 vs 132.701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 vs 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 vs 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4763 vs 4739 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- 1009.6x better floating-point performance: 7,168 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9603 vs 9463
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53783 vs 46658
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 140.274 vs 137.469
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3595.432 vs 2083.862
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.082 vs 12.352
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 789.536 vs 762.142
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9603 vs 9463 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53783 vs 46658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 140.274 vs 137.469 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 vs 2083.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.082 vs 12.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 789.536 vs 762.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon R9 Fury |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9463 | 9603 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 | 797 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 46658 | 53783 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | 140.274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | 3595.432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | 13.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | 132.701 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | 789.536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4763 | 4739 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Polaris 30 | Fiji |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 | 10 July 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $549 |
Place in performance rating | 260 | 277 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $399.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | 56 |
Core clock speed | 1469 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 7.1 TFLOPs | 7,168 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | 3584 |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s | 224.0 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 8,900 million |
Pipelines | 3584 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |