AMD Radeon RX 590 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1469 MHz vs 988 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- 780.1x more texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 21% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6612 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 796 vs 695
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 46717 vs 39431
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13383 vs 13107
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13383 vs 13107
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 vs 5 March 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1469 MHz vs 988 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 6612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 796 vs 695 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 46717 vs 39431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 vs 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 vs 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- 963.9x better floating-point performance: 6,844 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11869 vs 9463
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11869 vs 9463 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9463 | 11869 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 796 | 695 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 46717 | 39431 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4763 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 30 | GM200 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 | 5 March 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $4,999 |
Place in performance rating | 260 | 234 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1469 MHz | 988 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 7.1 TFLOPs | 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s | 285.2 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 8,000 million |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 317.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |