AMD Radeon RX 640 vs AMD FirePro M4150
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and AMD FirePro M4150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 715 MHz
- 2271.6x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3278 vs 1764
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3278 vs 1764
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10390 vs 3545
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 341 vs 177
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1950 vs 946
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 16 October 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 715 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 vs 1764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 vs 1764 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10390 vs 3545 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 vs 177 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1950 vs 946 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4150
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2181 vs 1769
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2181 vs 1769
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2775
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2775
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2181 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2181 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 2775 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M4150
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | AMD FirePro M4150 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 2181 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 2181 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 1764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 1764 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10390 | 3545 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 | 177 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1950 | 946 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | AMD FirePro M4150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Arctic Islands | Opal |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 16 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 810 | 1088 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 715 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 17.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,040 million |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 640 with others
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450A
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
