AMD Radeon RX 640 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 640

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
3.6x more core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1100 MHz
10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1769 vs 1514
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1769 vs 1514
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3278 vs 2306
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3278 vs 2306
Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10390 vs 6440
Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1952 vs 1347

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 3 January 2017
Core clock speed	1082 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Pipelines	512 vs 48
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1769 vs 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1769 vs 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3278 vs 2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3278 vs 2306
Geekbench - OpenCL	10390 vs 6440
PassMark - G3D Mark	1952 vs 1347

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2775
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2775

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333 vs 2775
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333 vs 2775

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

1514

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

1514

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

3333

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

3333

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

2306

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

2306

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10390

6440

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

340

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1952

1347

Name	AMD Radeon RX 640	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1769	1514
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1769	1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2775	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2775	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3278	2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3278	2306
Geekbench - OpenCL	10390	6440
PassMark - G2D Mark	340	340
PassMark - G3D Mark	1952	1347
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		36.485
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		246.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		21.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		42.981
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		720

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 640	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Generation 9.5
Code name	Arctic Islands	Kaby Lake GT3e
Launch date	13 May 2019	3 January 2017
Place in performance rating	810	1159
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz	1100 MHz
Compute units	8
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	77.95 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Pipelines	512	48
Pixel fill rate	19.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	189 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x1
Length	5.7 inches (145 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	Dual-slot
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	32 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4
Shared memory		1
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Quick Sync