AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 1070.9x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 36.4 GTexel / s
- Around 52% higher pipelines: 512 vs 336
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 11 October 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 36.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 336 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
- Around 94% higher memory clock speed: 3400 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 1769
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 1769
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2775
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2775
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2775 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10390 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1952 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.112 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.736 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Arctic Islands | GF104 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 11 October 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 810 | 1081 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 336 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 36.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,950 million |
| Floating-point performance | 873.6 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 210 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 108.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 3400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 640 with others
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450A
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
