AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- 1572.4x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 24.79 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3278 vs 2918
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3278 vs 2918
- Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10390 vs 6139
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 18 February 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 24.79 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 vs 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 vs 2918 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10390 vs 6139 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1813 vs 1769
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1813 vs 1769
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2775
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2775
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 474 vs 340
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2145 vs 1952
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 vs 1769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 vs 1769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 2775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 2775 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 474 vs 340 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2145 vs 1952 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 2918 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10390 | 6139 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 474 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1952 | 2145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.835 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.651 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Arctic Islands | GM107 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 18 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 810 | 994 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 24.79 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,870 million |
Floating-point performance | 793.3 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 145 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |