AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1968 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 2589 MHz vs 1590 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16493 vs 15107
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 917 vs 812
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1968 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz vs 1590 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16493 vs 15107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 vs 812 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
- Around 44% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2048
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22622 vs 15486
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6319 vs 3728
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5714 vs 3367
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22622 vs 15486
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6319 vs 3728
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5714 vs 3367
- Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10098 vs 9579
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2944 vs 2048 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 vs 15486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6319 vs 3728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5714 vs 3367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 vs 15486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6319 vs 3728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5714 vs 3367 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10098 vs 9579 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16493 | 15107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 | 812 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 81419 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15486 | 22622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 | 6319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 5714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15486 | 22622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 | 6319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 5714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9579 | 10098 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 23 XT | TU104 |
Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 | 29 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
Place in performance rating | 157 | 106 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Price now | $699.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 37.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz | 1590 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 1968 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 662.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.21 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.60 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |