AMD Radeon RX 6600M vs AMD Radeon Pro V520
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600M and AMD Radeon Pro V520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 235.8 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13595 vs 12258
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 700 vs 525
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64642 vs 61570
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14178 vs 13220
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14178 vs 13220
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 1 Dec 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 235.8 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13595 vs 12258 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 700 vs 525 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64642 vs 61570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14178 vs 13220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14178 vs 13220 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 8612
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 8006
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 8612
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 8006
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1792 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 vs 8612 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 vs 8006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 vs 8612 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 vs 8006 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro V520
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600M | AMD Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13595 | 12258 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 700 | 525 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64642 | 61570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14178 | 13220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 | 16807 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 | 37642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14178 | 13220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 | 16807 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 | 37642 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7940 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6600M | AMD Radeon Pro V520 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | Navi 23 | Navi 12 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 1 Dec 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 151 | 61 |
| Type | Laptop | Server |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | 36 |
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 471.5 GFLOPS (1:16) | 460.8 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.09 TFLOPS (2:1) | 14.75 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.544 TFLOPS | 7.373 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 134.7 GPixel/s | 102.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 235.8 GTexel/s | 230.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Width | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2048 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6600M with others
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIATITAN V
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
AMDRadeon 760M
