AMD Radeon RX 6600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600M and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon RX 6600M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 1005 MHz
Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1200 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8612 vs 3652
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8006 vs 3290
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8612 vs 3652
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8006 vs 3290

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2021 vs 13 August 2018
Core clock speed	1489 MHz vs 1005 MHz
Boost clock speed	2105 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8612 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8006 vs 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8612 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8006 vs 3290

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 13595
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 700
2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 136722 vs 64614
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 14178
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 14178

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	19370 vs 13595
PassMark - G2D Mark	869 vs 700
Geekbench - OpenCL	136722 vs 64614
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	21578 vs 14178
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	21578 vs 14178

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

13595

19370

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

700

869

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

64614

136722

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14178

21578

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8612

3652

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8006

3290

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14178

21578

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8612

3652

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8006

3290

Name	AMD Radeon RX 6600M	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G3D Mark	13595	19370
PassMark - G2D Mark	700	869
Geekbench - OpenCL	64614	136722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14178	21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8612	3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8006	3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14178	21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8612	3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8006	3290
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	7938	0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		2101.927

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 6600M	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 23	TU102
Launch date	2021	13 August 2018
Place in performance rating	151	103
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$9,999
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2105 MHz	1200 MHz
Compute units	28
Core clock speed	1489 MHz	1005 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	471.5 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	15.09 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7.544 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1792
Pixel fill rate	134.7 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	235.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	11060 million	18,600 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.2	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	256 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6