AMD Radeon RX 6600M vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600M and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 280 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8612 vs 3707
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8006 vs 3353
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8612 vs 3707
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8006 vs 3353
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 18 December 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 280 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- 2.6x more pipelines: 4608 vs 1792
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 13595
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 vs 700
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 64611
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 14178
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 14178
- Around 91% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 15164 vs 7938
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 1792 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19986 vs 13595 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 vs 700 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 64611 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 14178 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 14178 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 vs 7938 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600M | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13595 | 19986 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 700 | 827 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64611 | 138072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14178 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14178 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7938 | 15164 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6600M | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 23 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 18 December 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 151 | 90 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 471.5 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.09 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.544 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 4608 |
| Pixel fill rate | 134.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 235.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 280 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6600M with others
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIATITAN V
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
AMDRadeon 760M
