AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 946 vs 928
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 vs 5461.22
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 197.183 vs 174.185
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 vs 3718
- 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 vs 3358
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 vs 3718
- 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 vs 20 September 2018 |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 946 vs 928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 vs 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 vs 174.185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21601 vs 19824
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 134929 vs 100473
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 vs 349.422
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.104 vs 34.064
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 vs 1699.337
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 15315
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 15315
- Around 45% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3537 vs 2435
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21601 vs 19824 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 134929 vs 100473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 vs 349.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 vs 34.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 vs 1699.337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 vs 15315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 vs 15315 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3537 vs 2435 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 | 21601 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 946 | 928 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 100473 | 134929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | 41.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | 174.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2435 | 3537 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 22 | TU102 |
Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 | 20 September 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | $999 |
Place in performance rating | 51 | 91 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $1,279.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |