AMD Radeon RX 6800M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800M and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 61% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1440 MHz
  • Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1770 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87785 vs 74179
  • 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18453 vs 3717
  • 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 16764 vs 3357
  • 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18453 vs 3717
  • 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 16764 vs 3357
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2021 vs 13 August 2018
Core clock speed 2321 MHz vs 1440 MHz
Boost clock speed 2581 MHz vs 1770 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 87785 vs 74179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 18453 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 16764 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 18453 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 16764 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

  • 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
  • Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 13297
  • Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 549
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 17137
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 17137
  • Around 24% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 11265
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 18872 vs 13297
PassMark - G2D Mark 791 vs 549
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19571 vs 17137
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19571 vs 17137
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 13943 vs 11265

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
13297
18872
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
549
791
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
87785
74179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
17137
19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18453
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16764
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
17137
19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18453
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16764
3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
11265
13943
Name AMD Radeon RX 6800M NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark 13297 18872
PassMark - G2D Mark 549 791
Geekbench - OpenCL 87785 74179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 17137 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 18453 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 16764 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 17137 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 18453 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 16764 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 11265 13943
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1534.582

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 6800M NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Turing
Code name Navi 22 TU102
Launch date 2021 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 74 112
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $6,299

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2581 MHz 1770 MHz
Compute units 40
Core clock speed 2321 MHz 1440 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 13.21 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560
Pixel fill rate 165.2 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 413.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 230 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 17200 million 18,600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 384.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 192 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6