AMD Radeon RX 6800M vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800M and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 280 Watt
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18453 vs 3707
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 16764 vs 3353
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18453 vs 3707
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 16764 vs 3353
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 18 December 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 280 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18453 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 16764 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18453 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 16764 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 2560
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 13297
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 vs 549
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 87802
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 17137
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 17137
- Around 35% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 15164 vs 11258
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 2560 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19986 vs 13297 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 vs 549 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 87802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 17137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 17137 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 vs 11258 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800M | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13297 | 19986 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 827 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 87802 | 138072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17137 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18453 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 16764 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17137 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18453 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 16764 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11258 | 15164 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6800M | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 22 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 18 December 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 75 | 90 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 4608 |
| Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 280 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17200 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6800M with others
AMDRadeon RX 6800M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 6800M vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800
AMDRadeon RX 6800M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6800M vs
AMDRadeon RX 6750 XT
AMDRadeon RX 6800M vs
NVIDIAL4
AMDRadeon RX 6800M vs
AMDRadeon RX 7700S
