AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- Around 5% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4864
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26859 vs 20556
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1048 vs 997
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 160984 vs 107152
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 vs 311.869
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 vs 35.311
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 125
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 vs 1477.456
- Around 79% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20911 vs 11652
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 4864 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26859 vs 20556 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 vs 997 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 160984 vs 107152 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 vs 311.869 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 vs 35.311 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 vs 125 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 vs 1477.456 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20911 vs 11652 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 17213
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 17213
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26859 | 20556 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 | 997 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 160984 | 107152 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 311.869 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 4657.322 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 35.311 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 125 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 1477.456 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 27478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 27478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20911 | 11652 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Code name | Navi 21 | GA104 |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 1 Dec 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $399 |
| Place in performance rating | 70 | 102 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Compute units | 80 | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 4864 |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
IntelArc A770
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
