AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1240 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 9.8x more pipelines: 704 vs 72
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 509
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14665 vs 10015
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 vs 1671
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 vs 1671
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 1 September 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1240 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Pipelines | 704 vs 72 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 vs 509 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14665 vs 10015 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 vs 1671 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2231 vs 2120
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3175 vs 3107
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3175 vs 3107
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 vs 2120 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 vs 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 vs 3107 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2120 | 2231 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 | 509 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14665 | 10015 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 | 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | 3175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 | 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 | 3175 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | Raven | Skylake GT4e |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 812 | 664 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1240 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 72 |
Texture fill rate | 55 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |