AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
• Around 10% higher pipelines: 704 vs 640
• Around 26% better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 318
• Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14664 vs 10582
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 vs 48.966
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 vs 163.204

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

• 3.6x more core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3241 vs 2120
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 52.821 vs 40.991
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 793.297 vs 364.578
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 3.196
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4941 vs 3455
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2645 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3107
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4941 vs 3455
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2645 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3107

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2120 3241
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	527 318
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14664 10582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.991 52.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	364.578 793.297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.196 3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.784 48.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	262.35 163.204
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3359

Compare specifications (specs)