AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 vs ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 and ATI Radeon IGP 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
- Videocard is newer: launch date 17 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 8.8x more boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 160 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 180 nm
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 5 October 2002 |
Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 160 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 180 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
GPU 2: ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 | ATI Radeon IGP 320M |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 902 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 101 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 | ATI Radeon IGP 320M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega | Rage 7 |
Code name | Vega | RS320 |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 5 October 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 1528 | 1357 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 160 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 180 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | |
Core clock speed | 160 MHz | |
Transistor count | 30 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 1.4 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 4x | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | yes |