AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs AMD FirePro W9100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1156 MHz vs 930 MHz
• 2015.9x more texture fill rate: 330.00 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
• Around 27% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2816
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 210 Watt vs 750 Watt
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13296 vs 7987
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 vs 752
• 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 vs 43046
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 184.405 vs 106.585
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.606 vs 9.751
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1022.925 vs 511.115
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14462 vs 9143
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14462 vs 9143

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100

• 498.9x better floating-point performance: 5,238 gflops vs 10.5 TFLOPs
• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1878.403 vs 1765.06
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.208 vs 79.32
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3717
• 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3361
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3717
• 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3361

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13296 7987
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	774 752
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	163998 43046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.405 106.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1765.06 1878.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.606 9.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.32 82.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1022.925 511.115
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14462 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3361 32085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14462 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3361 32085

Compare specifications (specs)