AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1471 MHz vs 1379 MHz
• 1869.7x more texture fill rate: 330.00 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
• Around 75% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2048
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13305 vs 9982
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 437
• 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 vs 37928
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1022.925 vs 692.9
• Around 41% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6870 vs 4887

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1156 MHz
• 537.9x better floating-point performance: 5,648 gflops vs 10.5 TFLOPs
• Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 210 Watt
• 5x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 vs 184.405
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2293.496 vs 1765.06
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.704 vs 12.606
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.717 vs 79.32
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14915 vs 14462
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3717
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3361
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14915 vs 14462
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3717
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3361

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13305 9982
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	775 437
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	163998 37928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.405 214.123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1765.06 2293.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.606 12.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.32 139.717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1022.925 692.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14462 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3361 8048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14462 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3361 8048
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	6870 4887

Compare specifications (specs)