AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

NVIDIA Quadro P4000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1406 MHz vs 1202 MHz
Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1677 MHz vs 1480 MHz
2589.3x more texture fill rate: 429.30 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
2.3x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1792
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19324 vs 15267
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19324 vs 15267

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 August 2017 vs 6 February 2017
Core clock speed	1406 MHz vs 1202 MHz
Boost clock speed	1677 MHz vs 1480 MHz
Texture fill rate	429.30 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	4096 vs 1792
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 16 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19324 vs 15267
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19324 vs 15267
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3723 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3723 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000

387.2x better floating-point performance: 5,304 gflops vs 13.7 TFLOPs
3.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 345 Watt
4x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 1890 MHz

Floating-point performance	5,304 gflops vs 13.7 TFLOPs
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 345 Watt
Memory clock speed	7604 MHz vs 1890 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19324

15267

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19324

15267

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3723

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3723

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3362

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3362

3358

Name	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling	NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19324	15267
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19324	15267
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3723	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3723	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362	3358
PassMark - G3D Mark		11654
PassMark - G2D Mark		827
Geekbench - OpenCL		42289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		152.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1590.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		11.365
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		45.977
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		751.626
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		4904

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling	NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Pascal
Code name	Vega 10	GP104
Design	Radeon RX Vega Series
Launch date	7 August 2017	6 February 2017
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	$815
Place in performance rating	208	275
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Price now		$799.99
Value for money (0-100)		17.17
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1677 MHz	1480 MHz
Compute units	64
Core clock speed	1406 MHz	1202 MHz
Floating-point performance	13.7 TFLOPs	5,304 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	840 GFLOPs
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	26.7 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	13.4 TFLOPs
Pipelines	4096	1792
Pixel fill rate	107.30 GP/s
Render output units	64
Stream Processors	4096
Texture fill rate	429.30 GTexel/s	165.8 GTexel / s
Texture Units	256
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	345 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	12,500 million	7,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Display Port		1.4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	282 mm	241 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	1000 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12	12
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model		5.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	483.8 GB/s	192 GB / s
Memory bus width	2048 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1890 MHz	7604 MHz
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
FreeSync
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore
3D Stereo
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus