AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1546 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 175.4x more texture fill rate: 395.80 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 295 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14406 vs 8137
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 801 vs 745
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 vs 53806
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.478 vs 141.474
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.889 vs 13.132
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 129.271 vs 112.973
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1328.033 vs 799.933
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14744 vs 10141
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14744 vs 10141
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 August 2017 vs 26 April 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1546 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 395.80 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 295 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14406 vs 8137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 801 vs 745 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 vs 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 vs 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.889 vs 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 vs 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 vs 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 1290.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 8,192 gflops vs 12.7 TFLOPs
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 vs 2129.009
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3358
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops vs 12.7 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 vs 2129.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14406 | 8137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 801 | 745 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 | 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 | 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2129.009 | 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.889 | 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 | 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 | 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 38251 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7527 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Capsaicin |
Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | reference |
Launch date | 7 August 2017 | 26 April 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | 172 | 190 |
Price now | $449.99 | $849 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 41.07 | 17.05 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1546 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Compute units | 64 | 128 |
Core clock speed | 1247 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 12.7 TFLOPs | 2x 8,192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 8192 | 2x 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 395.80 GTexel/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 295 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 8,900 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | 277 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | DirectX® 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR |