AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and AMD Radeon R9 M485X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1247 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 4277.1x more texture fill rate: 395.80 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 8192 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14393 vs 3661
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 vs 417
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 August 2017 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1247 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 395.80 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 8192 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14393 vs 3661 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 vs 417 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M485X
- 233.1x better floating-point performance: 2,961 gflops vs 12.7 TFLOPs
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 295 Watt
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops vs 12.7 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 295 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M485X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | AMD Radeon R9 M485X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14393 | 3661 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 | 417 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2129.009 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.889 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7522 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | AMD Radeon R9 M485X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Amethyst |
Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Launch date | 7 August 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Place in performance rating | 170 | 272 |
Price now | $449.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1546 MHz | |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1247 MHz | 723 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12.7 TFLOPs | 2,961 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 8192 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 395.80 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 295 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 279 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Enduro |