AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1247 MHz vs 846 MHz
  • 29231.9x more texture fill rate: 395.80 GTexel/s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
  • 42.7x more pipelines: 8192 vs 192
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
  • 22.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14406 vs 641
  • Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 801 vs 441
  • 13.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14744 vs 1087
  • Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2012
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3071
  • 13.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14744 vs 1087
  • Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2012
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3071
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 August 2017 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed 1247 MHz vs 846 MHz
Texture fill rate 395.80 GTexel/s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines 8192 vs 192
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 14406 vs 641
PassMark - G2D Mark 801 vs 441
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14744 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14744 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3071

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

  • 25.6x better floating-point performance: 324.9 gflops vs 12.7 TFLOPs
  • 9.8x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 295 Watt
  • Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Floating-point performance 324.9 gflops vs 12.7 TFLOPs
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 295 Watt
Memory clock speed 2400 MHz vs 1890 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14406
641
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
801
441
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14744
1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14744
1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3071
Name AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G3D Mark 14406 641
PassMark - G2D Mark 801 441
Geekbench - OpenCL 204168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 195.478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2129.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 14.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 129.271
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1328.033
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14744 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14744 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3071
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7527

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 Kepler 2.0
Code name Vega 10 GK208
Design Radeon RX Vega Series
Launch date 7 August 2017 23 July 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $499
Place in performance rating 172 827
Price now $449.99
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100) 41.07

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1546 MHz
Compute units 64
Core clock speed 1247 MHz 846 MHz
Floating-point performance 12.7 TFLOPs 324.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 840 GFLOPs
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 26.7 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 13.4 TFLOPs
Pipelines 8192 192
Pixel fill rate 98.90 GP/s
Render output units 64
Stream Processors 4096
Texture fill rate 395.80 GTexel/s 13.54 GTexel / s
Texture Units 256
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 295 Watt 30 Watt
Transistor count 12,500 million 1270 Million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Length 279 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 750 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 12
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model 5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 483.8 GB/s 19.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 2048 bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1890 MHz 2400 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
FreeSync
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready
ZeroCore
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus