AMD Radeon RX Vega vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon RX Vega

NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 846 MHz
22.7x more texture fill rate: 307.2 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
21.3x more pipelines: 4096 vs 192
30.3x better floating-point performance: 9,830 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
19.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12297 vs 641
2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 441
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2094 vs 1087
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2391 vs 2012
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 3071
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2094 vs 1087
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2391 vs 2012
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 3071

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 April 2017 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 846 MHz
Texture fill rate	307.2 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines	4096 vs 192
Floating-point performance	9,830 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	12297 vs 641
PassMark - G2D Mark	882 vs 441
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2094 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2391 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8455 vs 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2094 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2391 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8455 vs 3071

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

7.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 225 Watt
Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 2000 MHz

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed	2400 MHz vs 2000 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

12297

641

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

882

441

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2094

1087

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2391

2012

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8455

3071

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2094

1087

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2391

2012

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8455

3071

Name	AMD Radeon RX Vega	NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G3D Mark	12297	641
PassMark - G2D Mark	882	441
Geekbench - OpenCL	67658
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	205.049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	4007.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	18.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	215.8
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1292.989
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2094	1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2391	2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8455	3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2094	1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2391	2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8455	3071

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX Vega	NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.3	Kepler 2.0
Code name	Greenland	GK208
Launch date	1 April 2017	23 July 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$599.99
Place in performance rating	239	830
Price now	$409.99
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100)	38.94
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	846 MHz
Floating-point performance	9,830 gflops	324.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	4096	192
Texture fill rate	307.2 GTexel / s	13.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count		1270 Million
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Laptop size		medium sized
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	512 GB / s	19.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2400 MHz
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors		No outputs
Display Port		1.2
API support
DirectX		12
OpenGL		4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus